新闻中心

前裁判谈布鲁日进球被吹:确实存在对什琴斯尼的犯规(前裁判评布鲁日进球被判无效:确有对什琴斯尼的犯规)

日期:2026-01-02

Analyzing Match Rules

I’m thinking about the match between Juventus and Club Brugge. Juventus usually competes in Serie A and Europe, but these two teams rarely meet except in friendlies. If Szczesny plays for Juventus in 2024-25, perhaps it could be a summer friendly? I should avoid guessing specifics without knowing for sure. Instead, I can talk generally about VAR reviews and what constitutes fouls against goalkeepers, like impeding with contact or illegal use of arms.Explaining VAR Decisions

li

I'm explaining that the threshold for overturning an on-field decision is based on a "clear and obvious" standard. If a goal is awarded, VAR checks for evidence to confirm it. There's a difference between "playing in the GK line" and legal blocking, which includes factors like distance to the goalkeeper and contact made. I can offer options for the user: would they prefer a quick breakdown of the laws or a recap of a specific match? If they have a clip, I can help find the exact play.Providing a Short Analysis

I want to consider the network mode and established guidelines, which suggest assuming a workspace-write and network-enabled situation while avoiding browsing unless specifically asked. So, I could create a short analysis in bullet points:

  • The law involved is Law 12, which covers fouls and misconduct related to goalkeepers.
  • VAR protocol requires a "clear and obvious" threshold for overturning goals.
  • Typical fouls include backing into or holding the GK, illegal screens, or blocking with extended arms.
  • Edge cases might involve minimal contact or situations where an attacker is offside but still interferes.

I should then check with the user: do they want me to pull a clip for frame-by-frame analysis or just a summary of statements from ex-referees? I'll keep it concise.Crafting the Response

Okay, I want to acknowledge that these decisions typically revolve around protecting the goalkeeper and determining interference lines. I’ll list 4-5 bullet points for clarity:

Decis

  • Basis: Law 12 from the competition rules; defining the goalkeeper's control, such as touching the ball with their hands.
  • Typical actions constituting a foul.
  • VAR intervention logic and considerations for the goal line area.
  • Conditions under which a goal may be deemed valid.
  • Offer options: If you have footage, I can help analyze it frame by frame, or I can look up details about this decision if you want me to access the network.

Let's make sure I'm keeping it general regarding the match context!

要点梳理(为何会判对什琴斯尼犯规)

revol

  • 规则依据:竞赛规则第12条(犯规与不当行为)。常见点是“阻碍对手(伴随接触)”“冲撞门将”“拉拽/抱摔”,以及门将对球的控制定义(哪怕一只手按住或托住球,都算控制)。
  • 典型犯规特征:用手臂/身体顶住门将致其无法起跳或出拳;两手接触并明显推移门将;背身卡位但有持续用力向门将挤压;压住/钩住门将手臂;借门将“做梯子”起跳。
  • VAR介入逻辑:若场上判进球,VAR需找到“清晰且明显”的进攻方犯规证据才会改判;若场上已判犯规在先,VAR通常只会“确认”而非推翻除非有明显相反证据。
  • 门前对抗的判尺度:规则并未给予门将在小禁区内“额外特权”,但由于空中对抗的脆弱性,实务中对门将的轻微持续性推搡/阻挡更容易被吹。
  • 常见边界情形:门将主动撞上静止进攻者一般不构成进攻方犯规;纯粹肩并肩、无手臂外张、无位移的轻微接触可能被放行;但若影响门将起跳路线/手臂摆动,多数会判犯规并取消进球。

需要我:

  1. 找到这次具体回合与前裁判的原话并做要点摘录;或
  2. 你给我视频片段,我按画面逐帧说明哪些动作触发了犯规判定。
0
首页
电话
短信
联系